Early modern scientific illustration in books showed, directed and depicted the contemporary state of human understanding and curiosity on a particular subject. Many items in the Prints Collection are plates or illustrations first found in books. They were set within a page that have been removed, either by booksellers or by the books owners. They were frequently mounted, obscuring their original provenance, although in some cases the text on the verso of illustrations can be seen. Part of the research work of the Making Prints Public project has been to trace these images and put them in their correct context. In many cases, former owners have annotated the mounts, including by Robert Gunther, the first museum curator.
The prints collection includes woodcuts, including some particularly fine examples taken from the Nuremberg Chronicle (1493). The majority date from the seventeenth to the nineteenth century. Engraving, intaglio processes, and etching are the techniques most often found in the collection. The invention of metal engraving allowed for finer lines and increasingly realistic expression. Older woodcut printing became more refined. Plagiarism was rife. Novel and popular images, such as Albrecht Durer’s Rhinoceros, were frequently copied, line by line, leading to distortions: a horn (not found in the original) was eventually added to later versions.
Over the early modern period, the printed image regained its position as essential as the text to the transmission of scientific knowledge. Over centuries illustrations had often been ‘copied out’ of manuscripts based entirely on handwritten text. The printing revolution saw illustrations put back into classical and medieval works by Ptolemy, Galen and Vitruvius. The age of exploration encouraged curiosity in natural phenomena.
The encyclopaedia developed over the early modern period as literary work and as a form. The creation of encyclopaedic catalogues to advertise and document the first wunderkammer (or cabinets of curiosity) collections included flourishes of anatomical detail in depictions of natural specimens in the works of Aldrovandi, Severino and Ole Worm. However, not all encyclopaedias on natural history included illustrations. The works of John Ray described 18,600 plant species in 3,000 pages without pictures on the basis that they were frivolous. The development of forms of etching and engraving allowed for pictures to become teaching instruments. In the 18th century, the anatomists and lecturers William and John Hunter, founder of the Hunterian Museum in London, employed their own artists and engravers to help to produce their encyclopaedias.
The invention of microscopy allowed for the depiction of microstructures, not visible to the human eye. The first accurate images of many insects were found Robert Hooke’s Micrographia . Hooke’s image of the flea is often missing from the printed works, because it has been removed for display by fascinated owners. Jan Swammerdem (1637-1680) was a pioneer of anatomical illustration of insects, who made studies of the creatures in minute detail, illuminating their circulatory systems using mercury. The development of the telescope had a similar effect to that of the microscope. Hevelius produced the first maps of the moon. Illustration of varying, competing and obsolete cosmologies, from Aristoleian to Platonic to Copernican to Tychonic allowed comparison in an age when experimental observation and human reasoning were causing cosmological beliefs to become outmoded. Such illustration was more instant and thus clear than explanation through prose.
Over the eighteenth century, there was increasing use of colour in engraving, particularly for works of natural history. The softness of copper allowed for better etching, particularly in works related to chemistry, depicting glassware or laboratory ware. The discovery of lithography allowed for brighter colour use in illustration and was first used in a book of botanical illustrations in 1812. Half-tone replaced line as the predominant technique, and coloured illustrations became more common than monochrome into the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
Further reading: Elizabeth Eisenstein, The printing press as an agent of change : communications and cultural transformations in early modern Europe (Cambridge UP, Cambridge, 2003)
Brian J. Ford, Images of science : a history of scientific illustration (The British Library: London 1992)
Brian J. Ford ‘Scientific Illustration in the Eighteenth Century’ in The Cambridge History of Science, Volume 4: Eighteenth-Century Science, edited by Roy Porter (Cambridge UP, Cambridge, 2003)